The Prime Minister has announced the launch of the government’s Aspirational Block Programme (ABP), which aims to improve the performance of blocks that are lagging on various development parameters.
![](https://easternmirrornagaland.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/MODI-4-pxr2b8o89x7b04w6fyzs3i15jy1es3o6xtfomckpbg.jpg)
Aspirational Block Programme (ABP)
- The Aspirational Blocks Programme is modeled after the Aspirational Districts Programme, which was launched in 2018 and covers 112 districts throughout the country.
- In the Union Budget 2022-23, the Centre announced its intention to launch this initiative.
- Initially, the program will cover 500 districts across 31 states and union territories.
- More than half of these blocks are located in six states: Uttar Pradesh (68 blocks), Bihar (61 blocks), Madhya Pradesh (42 blocks), Jharkhand (34 blocks), Odisha (29), and West Bengal (29).
- States, on the other hand, can add more blocks to the program later.
About Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP)
- The ‘Transformation of Aspirational Districts’ initiative, which was launched in January 2018, aims to eliminate this heterogeneity through a mass movement to quickly and effectively transform these districts.
- Convergence (of Central & State Schemes), Collaboration (of Central, State level ‘Prabhari’ Officers & District Collectors), and Competition among districts are the broad contours of the program.
- This program will focus on the strengths of each district, identify low-hanging fruits for immediate improvement, measure progress, and rank districts, with states serving as the primary drivers.
- Behind the name PM, the idea of naming any scheme based on its backwardness was then rejected.
- The name ‘Aspirational’, on the other hand, suggests a more affirmative action-based implementation of the scheme.
Selection of districts
- A total of 117 Aspirational districts have been identified by NITI Aayog based on composite indicators.
- The objective of the program is to monitor the real-time progress of aspirational districts based on 49 indicators (81 data points) from the 5 identified thematic areas.
Weightage has been accorded to these districts as below:
- Health & Nutrition (30%)
- Education (30%)
- Agriculture & Water Resources (20%)
- Financial Inclusion & Skill Development (10%)
- Basic Infrastructure (10%)
The strategy of the ADP
- The program’s core strategy can be summarised as follows.
- Making development a widespread movement in these areas
- Determine the low-hanging fruits and the strengths of each district in order to serve as a catalyst for development.
- To instill a sense of competition, track progress, and rank districts.
- Districts must strive to be the best in the state and the nation.
The ADP’s characteristics
- It has evolved into a Jan Andolan.
- The ADP is unique in its attempt to track the progress of these districts through real-time data tracking.
- The program aims to increase convergence between existing central and state government programs.
- Another notable feature is the district’s performance in the public domain and the experience building of the district bureaucracy.
- The program is aimed at the entire population of the district, rather than a specific group of beneficiaries.
What distinguishes this program?
- The program reflects what has happened to India’s development project under neoliberalism, particularly after the end of planning.
- Long-overdue sectors have received increased attention.
- It is not a customized program with a one-size-fits-all strategy. The districts have been given more responsibility. It has a district intervention strategy in place.
- It operates on the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) model and compares national best parameters for effective resource management.
- It is the Prime Minister’s most-reviewed program.
- A general idea behind the concept is that good work is never overlooked. It has been widely praised on social media and by government officials.
Programmatic Strengths
- The collection of baseline data and follow-ups at regular intervals is a key strength of the ADP.
- Maintaining this effort would result in a robust collection of statistics for use by researchers and policymakers alike.
- In doing so, the government also brings much-needed attention to human development and a willingness to meet the SDGs (SDGs).
- The rankings show that incremental progress is being made in the selected districts.
- The program also claims to be “non-partisan and unbiased,” with an emphasis on all-India growth.
- The selection of districts suggests that the program did not favor any regional, political, or other bias.
- The program aims to bring together central and state schemes centered on specific activities.
Problems with the program
- Using Bihar as an example, they argue that the selection of districts for programs is problematic.
- In fact, it excludes the poorest districts because per capita income, the most basic measure of development, is not considered.
- There appears to be some ambiguity regarding whether the program is only concerned with improved access or also with the quality of service provided.
- The indicators used are not defined relationally; rather, they are static indicators of human development that do not see people mired in dynamic social relations.
- It is also accused of not making any new or targeted public investments (except for the possible use of Flexi-funds) in these districts while moralizing about its inability to improve (through rankings).
- The program bears the burden of demonstrating the government’s “developmental” work while failing to address any of the fundamental issues surrounding equitable development.
- Nonetheless, the NITI Aayog defends the overall strategy as capitalizing on “low-hanging fruit.”
Way ahead
- The program has made a difference in the lives of Indian citizens by improving education, health, nutrition, financial inclusion, and skill development in some of the country’s most backward and geographically remote districts.
- ADP adheres to the principle of “leave no one behind,” which is at the heart of the SDGs. According to the report, the program’s rapid success is due to high-level political commitment.
- UNDP has suggested revising a few indicators that are close to saturation or are met by the majority of districts, such as ‘electrification of households’ as an indicator of basic infrastructure.
Source: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1889472#:~:text=Launching%20the%20Aspirational%20Block%20Programme,of%20the%20Aspirational%20Block%20Programme.